All peer review articles – Page 2
-
ResearchNanofertilisers have huge potential but studies suffer from severe shortcomings
Nanosize agrochemicals promise to boost crop yields but experiments are often inconsistent and unrealistic, analysis reveals
-
PuzzleOn the spot: expert reviewer
Should you review a paper that covers research you also work on?
-
NewsEvidence of gender bias found in peer review
Men were more likely to secure health research grants than women in Canadian study
-
NewsBlockchain to help scholarly publishing fight fraud
Platform can time-stamp data to authenticate research
-
NewsFake peer review hits RSC journals
Questions over true identity of recommended referees sees inorganic materials papers retracted from PCCP, Chemical Communications and Nanoscale
-
NewsNew claims that Exxon misled on climate change
Comparison of internal ExxonMobil documents with company’s advertorials finds marked discrepancy on firm’s position on climate
-
NewsChemRxiv preprint server now online
A place for chemists to share early results and data before formal peer review
-
NewsElsevier launches chemistry preprint server
Community-driven network will allow scientists to share ideas and post pre-peer review papers
-
NewsStudies flag signs of gender bias in peer review
Women appear to be underrepresented among reviewers and authors
-
NewsMonument to ‘anonymous peer reviewer’ unveiled
Sculpture celebrates ‘invisible heroes’ of science
-
NewsChemistry journal introduces ‘intelligent crowd’ peer review
Online platform aims to make peer review faster, unbiased and less of a burden on researchers
-
OpinionWhat could peer review look like in 2030?
AI, credit for reviewers and more pre-prints: Mark Peplow considers the options
-
NewsChemistry preprint server plan generates sparks
The American Chemical Society’s chemistry preprint server scheme has caused concern in some quarters
-
News
Irish institute in hot water with university ranking agency
Quacquarelli Symonds unhappy with emails sent to academics asking them to take part in survey
-
FeatureWho reviews the reviews?
Nina Notman investigates the new alternatives being developed to replace peer review as we know it
-
NewsMetrics have their place but peer review remains king
Review calls for responsible use of metrics in UK research
-
News
Fast-track peer review trial ends following resignations
Payment trial for expedited reviews ends in wake of editorial board resignations
-
NewsGrant application peer review system 'works well'
Statistical analysis finds high peer review scores are linked to more ‘impactful’ research
-
News
Scientists raise concern over fast-track peer review scheme
Payment scheme for expedited review leads one editor of Scientific Reports to resign
-
FeatureConduct and misconduct
After high profile hoaxes, the scientific community is looking to ensure that researchers maintain high standards of research integrity. Bea Perks reports
- Previous Page
- Page1
- Page2
- Page3
- Next Page