The US Department of Defense (DOD) will have to spend more than $2.1 billion (£1.5 billion) to clean up per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) contamination on its military bases, according to a new report by the congressional Government Accountability Office (GAO). The Pentagon has identified 687 military installations that have known or suspected contamination by these fluorinated chemicals.
‘These costs will likely increase significantly, because DOD is still in the early phases of its PFAS investigation,’ GAO concluded, noting that DOD officials have pointed out that regulatory uncertainty at the federal and state levels is a significant challenge in estimating PFAS environmental restoration costs.
The Environmental Working Group (EWG), which has identified 703 US military sites with known and suspected discharges of PFAS compounds, says the new GAO report confirms how little progress the Pentagon has made in cleaning up legacy PFAS pollution, and that the cost of remediation is going to grow. Research has linked the most well-known and best-studied of these compounds to health problems such as liver damage, reduced immune function, various cancers, birth defects and fertility issues.
‘Although some clean up actions might not yet be public, at this pace it could be decades before DOD cleans up the most contaminated sites,’ EWG said in a 22 June statement. Last year, media outlets reported that a top DOD official projected it could take more than three decades to remediate this PFAS pollution.
The primary source of such substances on military bases is firefighting foam that the Pentagon developed in the 1960s. In its report, the GAO notes that the DOD had identified six potential PFAS-free foam candidates as of March 2021, but such firefighting products have so far not met the agency’s performance requirements.
Among the report’s recommendations is that the DOD include cost estimates for its future PFAS investigations and clean up in the annual environmental report the agency delivers to Congress. The agency concurred with this suggestion.
No comments yet